Emersons+writting

This is a Responce to the Nature Essay that we had to read.

I think that this is a kind of poem were the things that one man thinks are written in the most complex writing ever heard. His intentions of writing this poem are good but he is just not doing it right. He is in the right path to teaching us a lesson about how to use our senses and how to use them in a very proper behavior when out in touch with the wild. I think that he is a very close writer like Walt Whitman that has the same idea of describing things in a way that make them sound more magnificent and that are completely true. If I could change something in the style of writing that Emerson has it would be that he does not know how to link his sentences and when he writes they neither match nor they give each other support. But when you try to picture the nature as Emerson describes it you can feel all the great things about life like watching the miraculous sunset or the river with its animals. 1201564293hre

I didn't really like this essay because he seemed to be preaching to go live witht the nature and be one with it and everything. I think that even though he lived there for two months, i still think that he should really live on the nature because two months isn't really that much. I think he should have actually lived out there and not just talked about it with his transendentalists friends. I don't really like the transendentalist club people because all they did was talk about stuff that needed to be changed and put some effort in changing it, but not much. Back to the poem, I think Emerson had a good point and brought it off well, but he really didn't follow up on it. To me Emerson and the transendentalists were kind of an all talk no do group of people, and they would not have sacrificed their warm houses and comfortable bed to go live with nature.

1201748268